李慧中;祁飞;

• 1:复旦大学经济学院

摘要(Abstract)：

本文主要对母市场效应理论进行文献评述。描述了Krugman关于母市场效应理论的最初模型,并介绍了对母市场效应的理论拓展和实证检验,文章最后提出了在中国出口市场面临一定变化和强调扩大内需条件下对中国制造业出口的母市场效应进行实证检验的一些设想。

关键词(KeyWords)： 母市场效应;规模报酬递增;出口成本;差异化产品

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“扩大内需与中国对外贸易的‘母市场效应’”(项目号:08JA790023)的资助

作者(Authors): 李慧中;祁飞;

DOI: 10.16091/j.cnki.cn32-1308/c.2011.01.029

参考文献(References)：

• 1.张帆、潘佐红:《本土市场效应及其对中国省间生产和贸易的影响》,《经济学(季刊)》2006年第5卷第2期。
• 2.Amiti M.,“Inter-industry Trade in Manufactures:Does Country Size Matter”,Journal ofInternational Economics,1998(44),231-255.
• 3.Anderson,James E.,“A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation”,American Economic Review,1979(69),106-116.
• 4.Armington,P.S.,“Atheory of demandfor products distinguished by place of production”,IMFStaffPapers,1969(16),159-176.
• 5.Behrens,k.,Lamorgese,A.,Ottaviano,G.I.P.,Tabuchi,T.,“Be-yondthe home market effect:Market size andspecializationin a multi-country world”,Journal ofinternational economics,2009(79),259-265.
• 6.Crozet,M.,and F.Trionfetti,“Trade costs andthe Home Market Ef-fect”,Journal ofInternational Economics,2008(76),309-321.
• 7.Davis,D.,and D.Weinstein,“Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure:An Empirical Investigation”,European Eco-nomic Review,1999,43(2),379-407.
• 8.Davis,D.,andD.Weinstein,“Market Access,Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage:An Empirical Test”,Journal ofInterna-tional Economics,2003,59(1),1-23.
• 9.Davis,D.,“The Home Market,Trade and Industrial Structure”,American Economic Review,1998,88(5),1264-1276.
• 10.Davis,D.,and D.Weinstein,“Does Economic Geography Matterfor International Specialisation”,NBER Working Papers5706,1996.
• 11.Dixit,Avinash K.,and Stiglitz,Joseph E,“Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity”,American Economic Review,1977,67(3),297-308.
• 12.Hanson,G.,andX.Chong,“The Home Market Effect and Bilateral Trade Patterns”,American Economic Review,2004,94(4),1108-1129.
• 13.Head,K.,andJ.Ries,“Increasing Returns Versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of US-Canada Trade”,American Economic Review,2001,91(4),858-876.
• 14.Head,K.,T.Mayer,andJ.Ries,“On the Pervasiveness of Home Market Effects”,Economica,2002,69(275),371-390.
• 15.Helpman,E.,and P.Krugman,Market Structure and Foreign Trade.Cambridge(Mass):MITPress,1985.
• 16.Holmes,T.,and J.Stevens,“Does Home Market Size Matter for the Pattern of Trade”,Journal ofInternational Economics,2005,65(2),489-505.
• 17.Krugman,P.,“Increasing returns and economic geography”,The Journal ofPolitical Economy,1991(99),483-499.
• 18.Linder,B.,“An essay on trade and transformation”,Uppsala:Almqvst and Wiksells,1961.
• 19.McCallum,J.,“National borders matter:Canada—US regional trade patterns”,American Economic Review,1995,85(3),615-623.
• 20.Rauch,James R.,“networks versus marketsininternational trade”,Journal ofinternational economics,1999(48),7-37.
• 21.Weder,R.,“Comparative Home Market Advantage:An Empirical Analysis of British and American Exports”,Reviewof World Eco-nomics,2003,139(2),220-247.
• 22.Yu,Z.,“Trade,Market Size,and Industrial Structure:the Home Market Effects Rivisited”,Canadian Journal ofEconomics,2005,38(1),255-272.