社会运动研究的国家-社会关系视角
张杨;
摘要(Abstract)：
政治机会结构理论是西方社会运动研究近30年来的主流范式。但此理论是基于西方国家政治体制和社会结构所归纳出的经验理论,在解释西方早期社会运动和非西方国家的社会运动方面,存在着自变量和因变量范围过于狭窄、解释能力不足等缺点。本文指出,国家主义理论以及后来进一步发展的国家-社会关系视角是研究社会运动的替代性范式。国家-社会关系清楚定义国家性质、社会性质以及国家与社会关系,对于认识作为集体性抗争政治形式的社会运动具有重要价值。
关键词(KeyWords)： 社会运动;政治机会结构;国家主义;国家-社会关系;政体
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Authors): 张杨;
DOI: 10.16091/j.cnki.cn32-1308/c.2007.05.012
参考文献(References)：
- 1.《马克思恩格斯选集》第一卷,中共中央编译局编,人民出版社,1995年。
- 2.塔尔蒙:《极权主义民主的起源》,孙传钊译,吉林人民出版社,2004年。
- 3.托克维尔:《旧制度与大革命》,冯棠译,商务印书馆,1996年。
- 4.韦伯:《经济与社会》,林荣远译,商务印书馆,1997年。
- 5.西瑟:《自由民主与政治学》,竺乾威译,上海人民出版社,1998年。
- 6.赵鼎新:《社会与政治运动讲义》,社会科学文献出版社,2006年。
- 8.Collins,Rodlall,“Maturation of the State-Centered Theory of Rev-olution and Ideology”,Sociological Theory,1993,11.
- 9.Eisinger,Peter K.,“The Conditions of Protest Behavior in Ameri-can Cities”,American Political Science Review,1973,67.
- 10.Evans,Peter B.,Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol1985,Bringingthe State Back In,Cambridge University Press.
- 11.Foran,John,“Theories of Revolution Revisited:Toward a Fourth Generation?”Sociological Theory,1993,11.
- 12.Goldstone,Jack A.,“Theories of Revolution:The Third Genera-tion”,World Politics,1980,3.
- 13.Goldstone,Jack A.,“Toward a Fourth Generation of revolutionary theory”,Annual ReviewPolitical Science,2001,4.
- 14.Goodwin,Jeff,No Other Way Out,Cambridge University Press,2001.
- 15.Jenkins,J.Craig.and Bert Klandermans(eds.),The Politics of Social Protest:Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Move-ments.University of Minnesota Press,1995.
- 16.Kitschelt,Herbert P.,“Political Opportunity Structures and Politi-cal Protest:Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.”Brit-ish Journal of Political Science,1986,16.
- 17.Kriesi,Hanspeter,Ruud Koopmans,Jan Willem Duyvendak and Marco G.Giugni,New Social Movements in Western Europe:AComparative Analysis.University of Minnesota Press,1995.
- 18.Linz,Juan J.,Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.Lynne Ri-enner Publishers,Inc,2000.
- 19.McAdam,Doug,Political Process and The Development Of Black Insurgency,1930-1970.The University of Chicago Press,1982.
- 20.McAdam,Doug,Sidney Tarrowand Charles Tilly,Dynamics Of Contention.Cambridge University Press,2001.
- 21.McCarthy,John D.and Mayer N.Zald,“The Enduring Vitality of The Resource Mobilization Theory of Social Movements.”pp.533-565in Handbook of Sociological Theory.Jonathan H.Turner,ed.NewYork:Kluwer Academic/PlenumPublishers,2002.
- 22.Meyer,David S.,“Protest and Political Opportunities.”Annual ReviewSociology,2004,30.
- 23.Migdal,Joel S.and Vivienne Shue1994,State Power and Social Force.Cambridge University Press.
- 24.Roy,Denny,“Singapore,China,and the’Soft Authoritarian’Challenge.”Asian Survey,1994,34.
- 25.Skocpol,Theda,States and Social Revolution:A Comparative Analysis of France,Russia and China.Cambridge University Press,1979.
- 26.Skocpol,Theda,“Bringingthe State Backin:Strategiesin Current Research.”in Bringingthe State BackIn,(eds.)by Peter Evans et al.Cambridge University Press,1985.
- 27.Tarrow,Sidney,“National Politics and Collective Action:Recent Theory and Researchin Western Europe andthe United States.”An-nual Reviewof Sociology,1988,14.
- 28.Tarrow,Sidney,Democracy and Disorder:Protest and Politics in Italy,1965-1975.Oxford University Press,1989.
- 29.Tarrow,Sidney,“States and Opportunities:The Political Structur-ing of Social Movements.”pp.41-61in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements,edited by Doug McAdam,John D.McCarthy and Mayer N.Zald.NewYork:Cambridge University Press,1996.
- 30.Tarrow,Sidney,Power in Movement:Social movements and Cont-entious Politics.Cambridge University Press,1998.
- 31.Tilly,Charles1978,From Mobilization to Revolution.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- 32.Tilly,Charles,“Social Movements and National Politics.”1984,pp.297-317,in Statemaking and Social Movements,edited by Charles Bright and Susan Harding.Ann Arbor,MI:The University of Michigan Press.
- 33.Tilly,Charles1995,Popular Contention in Great Britain1758-1834.Harvard University Press.
- 34.Winckler,Edwin A.1984,“Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan:FromHardto Soft Authoritarianism?”China Quarterly99.
- 35.Zhao,Dingxin2001,The Power of Tiananmen:State-Society Re-lations andthe1989Beijing Student Movement.University of Chica-go Press.